Dear media: here is Trump's game. He has no decency, but will use your decency against you. He has no morals, but will use your morals against you. He has no integrity, but will use your integrity against you. He lies compulsively, but will call you the liar. Stop helping him! — Infantry Vet (@ericgobucks) […]
There are facts and there is reality and to think otherwise is to head down a path that leads to chaos and madness. — Lee Potts ? (@LeePottsPoet) June 15, 2018
You can deny facts and reality all you want but, sooner or later, they're going to catch up with you. And no eye-rolling emoji is going to be able to keep it from happening. I really hope you're prepared for that. — Lee Potts ? (@LeePottsPoet) June 15, 2018
You're the one being dense here. No matter where the money comes from, once it goes into the foundation, the ways it can be dispersed and spent are restricted by state law because the foundation gets crazy tax breaks. Once it went in it was no longer, strictly speaking, his money — Lee Potts ? […]
That wasn't for a charity, it was used to settle a court case against him. — Lee Potts ? (@LeePottsPoet) June 15, 2018
Exactly, if he had total freedom to do what he wanted with it, it would just be a bank account. Foundations get tax beaks and there are rules about how the money can be distributed. I also think that he was not the only contributor. — Lee Potts ? (@LeePottsPoet) June 15, 2018
Those are funds from the foundation. By definition, it's not his money. — Lee Potts ? (@LeePottsPoet) June 15, 2018
No. No you won't. — Lee Potts ? (@LeePottsPoet) June 15, 2018
"100%"https://t.co/7U9EwhSGAd — Lee Potts ? (@LeePottsPoet) June 15, 2018
So wait, the report only would have been valid if it confirmed the conclusions you had already reached? — Lee Potts ? (@LeePottsPoet) June 14, 2018